WeHaveBeenHad-Congress Generous Tightwads

Buy Bendover Brand-Obama's Hillary Approved

Famously known is the story of real life-bigger-than-life-even, American hero David (Davy) Crockett [1]as a U.S. Representative from East Tennessee who met a very intelligent, well-read farmer named Horiatio Bunce. The farmer was livid about Congress' donation of $20,000 to Georgetown fire victims. The U.S. Constitution does not allow for such charity. As a result, Crockett gave his legendary "Not Yours to Give" speech. It was vehemently critical of his Congressional colleagues who were willing to outlay taxpayer money to help a widow of a US Navy man who had lived long enough to require that he retire from his naval service, but would not contribute their own salary for a week to the cause.[2] Ellis wrote in his tome how the once sure-fire-passage proposal died in committee because of Crockett's speech. Crockett was a "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington" type who thought for himself, even against President Andrew Jackson, which had caused him to lose his bid for re-election once.

The point is, Congress DOES NOT have the right to whimsically throw taxpayer money at "problems" as Congress sees fit. This is Woodrow Wilson/FDR Fabian socialism imported from Germany, most likely. The source of the plague is as MOOT as is the uncopywrighted brand of socialism, as the damage is extensive.

The 111th Congress, due to a GIVE-UP Republican 2008 candidate, has rode rough-shod, so-to-speak, over the cries and moans and complaints of the American people to spend money on bills "passed to see what is in them" to para-phrase Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker.

This is a TRAVESTY only to be remidied by VOTING OUT THE RASCALS of BOTH PARTIES.

If the Republicans try to run non-Conservatives or unknowns masquerading as Conservatives, The Tea Party people/unafiliated TRUE Republicans will have to defeat liberalism in whatever form it rears its UGLY HEAD.

THAT is the only cure for this spendthrift madness that has the USA so seeply in debt in 2010 with astronomical interest to pay...a total waste.

De-funding all the unreasonable Van Jones inspired if-not-written-by-Jones health care, cap and tax, left over unsqandered porkulus, and careful guidance into gradual elimination of debt-slavery, G_d willing.


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett
[2] Ellis, Edward S., The Life of Colonel David Crockett; Porter & Coates, 1884

esterday the Senate voted another $30 billion in stimulus," he warned. "They're like someone in the last throes of alcoholism. They're in the hospital. Doctors say 'your liver's gone. There's nothing we can do for you.' The patient says, 'That's fine. I'd just like a bottle of whiskey.'

"They are incapable of not spending your money. The best thing we can do with Congress is shut it down," he said.

But he said what is happening shouldn't be a surprise, because Obama simply is doing what he expressed a desire to do.

"This is not Bill Clinton," Corsi warned. "This is a trained, ideologically committed communist, trained by Frank Marshall Davis."

He cited Obama's links to Davis, who was a student of Saul Alinsky, whose book was dedicated to "Lucifer."

Hillary Clinton's 1969 Political Science Thesis ("There is Only the Fight") refers to an earlier version of Alinsky’s training manual. "In 1946,” she wrote, "Alinsky's first book, Reveille for Radicals, was published."



Hillary Rodham Clinton is a menace to underwear and everything that is in it. But that was her younger "baracuda" days. After she and Bill chose Janet (El Reenyo) Reno for Attorney General
not expecting Reno would blackmail a second term out of Bill according to assertions and allegations of Dick Morris, who knew both intimately allegedly. Reno had been "taking out Whitey Male for feminizm" in Florida and that was throughly vivariously thrilling for the too-busy Hillary who had too many capers on her plate and "irons in the fire" so to speak.



"Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday." --Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky

Obama helped fund 'Alinsky Academy': "The Woods Fund, a nonprofit on which Obama served as paid director from 1999 to December 2002, provided startup funding and later capital to the Midwest Academy.... Obama sat on the Woods Fund board alongside William Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization.... 'Midwest describes itself as 'one of the nation's oldest and best-known schools for community organizations, citizen organizations and individuals committed to progressive social change.'... Midwest teaches Alinsky tactics of community organizing."

Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky: "True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties.... Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.

"Obama is also an Alinskyite.... Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project.... Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer." (By Richard Poe, 11-27-07)

Saul Alinsky wrote "Rules for Radicals" in 1971 thus chiselling in granite his legacy of political depravity and maniacal mayheim. He even dedicated the book to his "boss", Lucifer. Conservatives are convinced by all the evil inspited by this book and his earlier "Reveille for Radicals" which trashed the minds of many intellectuals including Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Alinsky's "Rules for Radical" tactics were taken from and imitated the Neo-Marxist strategies of Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. By relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process instead a violent, Che Guevara-style bloody revolution, Gramsci's transformational Marxism was so cunningly subtle that few people even noticed the cautious, but continuous and deliberate changes.

Like Saul Alinsky, Mikhail Gorbachev diabolically chose to follow the malevolent, viralent teaching of Antonio Gramsci, not Lenin. Consequently, Gramsci made Stalin livid by suggestions that Lenin's revolutionary plan wouldn't be effective in the freedom-loving West. Rather the initial frontal assault would attack Biblical absolutes and Christian values, which must be obliterated as a redeeming social force before the new socialistic façade of Communism could hatch out like a pit of vipers and flourish. Malachi Martin reported progressive virilence :

"By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy in the West was weak and negligible.... Gramsci's master strategy was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity's transcendent God."
Perhaps Lucifer's other followers see Western decadence as ripeness for the outreach and tentacles of their own holy book's law. Is it written thus in the Satanic "Bible" and other literature? Probably. The allowance for deception by various means practically stipulates and condones gradual or not-so-gradual takeover of all host countries like a parasitic scourage.
One can even speculate that, like a Ouija Board, the tome, "Rules for Radicals" has its own accompanying demon pouncing on or embeding itself immovably into the reader who absorbs the diabolical tripe therein. Perhaps some see the dedication of the book to Lucifer as a joke.
Perhaps, like a Ouija Board and Nazi Paraphernalia, there is a fascination with evil that goes far beyond adherent innate curiosity to obsession and Socialistic mania accompanying the usual resident megamania of many Democrat and some Republican office seekers.